<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-Policing Vs. Regulation, and the Free Speech Bridge Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/self-policing-vs-regulation-and-the-free-speech-bridge-controversy/2007/11/16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/self-policing-vs-regulation-and-the-free-speech-bridge-controversy/2007/11/16/</link>
	<description>The Good Business Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:08:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bridge babes back, bullies back off &#171; Whiskey Tango Foxtrot</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/self-policing-vs-regulation-and-the-free-speech-bridge-controversy/2007/11/16/comment-page-1/#comment-7338</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridge babes back, bullies back off &#171; Whiskey Tango Foxtrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/self-policing-vs-regulation-and-the-free-speech-bridge-controversy/2007/11/16/#comment-7338</guid>
		<description>[...] since this blog was one of three selected for special consideration (the other two are here and here).  I was, to say the least, bemused to see myself described as a &#8220;liberal&#8221;.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] since this blog was one of three selected for special consideration (the other two are here and here).  I was, to say the least, bemused to see myself described as a &#8220;liberal&#8221;.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridge players thankful to be reinstated &#171; The Burger.</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/self-policing-vs-regulation-and-the-free-speech-bridge-controversy/2007/11/16/comment-page-1/#comment-7337</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridge players thankful to be reinstated &#171; The Burger.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/self-policing-vs-regulation-and-the-free-speech-bridge-controversy/2007/11/16/#comment-7337</guid>
		<description>[...] handful of the liberal bloggers who are defending the bridge players (for example, here, here and here) don&#8217;t seem to understand what the First Amendment says and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] handful of the liberal bloggers who are defending the bridge players (for example, here, here and here) don&#8217;t seem to understand what the First Amendment says and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush-bashing blogger baffled by bridge brouhaha &#171; Whiskey Tango Foxtrot</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/self-policing-vs-regulation-and-the-free-speech-bridge-controversy/2007/11/16/comment-page-1/#comment-7336</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush-bashing blogger baffled by bridge brouhaha &#171; Whiskey Tango Foxtrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/self-policing-vs-regulation-and-the-free-speech-bridge-controversy/2007/11/16/#comment-7336</guid>
		<description>[...] to say: A handful of the liberal bloggers who are defending the bridge players (for example, here, here and here) don&#8217;t seem to understand what the First Amendment says and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to say: A handful of the liberal bloggers who are defending the bridge players (for example, here, here and here) don&#8217;t seem to understand what the First Amendment says and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
