Self-Policing Vs. Regulation, and the Free Speech Bridge Controversy
My guest blog today is on whether the Code of Ethics, and self-regulation among bloggers generally, may help keep regulators out of blogs.
Also, my previous posts on that blog have attracted comments. In my response to one of yesterday’s comments, I brought up the strange saga of the insults hurled at members of the U.S. championship women’s bridge team, who have been accused by other bridge players of treason and sedition for holding a sign at the awards ceremony in Shanghai, declaring that they did not vote for Bush.
Well, it may not be to the liking of some conservative bridge players, but it’s a long way from the definition of treason or sedition. One could actually make more of a case that bush and some of his cronies have committed treason.
Last time I checked, it as enshrined in the Constitution (specifically the First Amendment) that Americans have a right to free speech. Whether or not this was an appropriate forum could be discussed (especially in the context of the self-regulation versus outside regulation question I raised on the IAOC blog), but the right not to be silenced is guaranteed, at least in theory.
[…] to say: A handful of the liberal bloggers who are defending the bridge players (for example, here, here and here) don’t seem to understand what the First Amendment says and […]
Pingback by Bush-bashing blogger baffled by bridge brouhaha « Whiskey Tango Foxtrot — November 20, 2007 @ 10:34 pm
[…] handful of the liberal bloggers who are defending the bridge players (for example, here, here and here) don’t seem to understand what the First Amendment says and […]
Pingback by Bridge players thankful to be reinstated « The Burger. — November 23, 2007 @ 11:28 am
[…] since this blog was one of three selected for special consideration (the other two are here and here). I was, to say the least, bemused to see myself described as a “liberal”. […]
Pingback by Bridge babes back, bullies back off « Whiskey Tango Foxtrot — November 23, 2007 @ 1:49 pm