<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Fox&#8217;s Acceptance of Paid Product Placement Slant News Coverage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/</link>
	<description>The Good Business Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:01:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: asus</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/comment-page-1/#comment-7735</link>
		<dc:creator>asus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7735</guid>
		<description>I don’t believe your comment policy had anything to do with the comment traffic, depending upon where you put it. The addition of a here to your comments policy within the comments area has no impact. Spelling out your comments policy with a lot of confrontational language within the comment form area can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t believe your comment policy had anything to do with the comment traffic, depending upon where you put it. The addition of a here to your comments policy within the comments area has no impact. Spelling out your comments policy with a lot of confrontational language within the comment form area can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Horowitz&#8217;s Monthly Newsletters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New on the Sites, August 2008</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/comment-page-1/#comment-7728</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Horowitz&#8217;s Monthly Newsletters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New on the Sites, August 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7728</guid>
		<description>[...] Does Fox’s Acceptance of Paid Product Placement Slant News Coverage? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Fox’s Acceptance of Paid Product Placement Slant News Coverage? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Horowitz - Ethical Marketing Expert</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/comment-page-1/#comment-7718</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Horowitz - Ethical Marketing Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7718</guid>
		<description>I got a comment on the Plaxo page (this blog is syndicated to both Facebook and Plaxo) asking why this was any worse than running an ad. My reply:

Because it is *directly affecting the willingness of Fox to run negative stories on its funders*, according to the article I referenced. I&#039;d have the same issue on the straight-ad side. And because when commercial material is presented as news, it distorts the viewers&#039; understanding of the truth. Product placement on the entertainment side, while still an issue, is much less of an issue for me than when it shows up in newscasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a comment on the Plaxo page (this blog is syndicated to both Facebook and Plaxo) asking why this was any worse than running an ad. My reply:</p>
<p>Because it is *directly affecting the willingness of Fox to run negative stories on its funders*, according to the article I referenced. I&#8217;d have the same issue on the straight-ad side. And because when commercial material is presented as news, it distorts the viewers&#8217; understanding of the truth. Product placement on the entertainment side, while still an issue, is much less of an issue for me than when it shows up in newscasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hartford fair</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/comment-page-1/#comment-7715</link>
		<dc:creator>hartford fair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7715</guid>
		<description>[...] of news? Maybe it would be better if we simply banned product placement on ???objective??? newhttp://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-...Singers selected for ???Idol&#039; contest Point Pleasant RegisterNicole Fields/photo - Five contestants [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of news? Maybe it would be better if we simply banned product placement on ???objective??? newhttp://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-&#8230;Singers selected for ???Idol&#8217; contest Point Pleasant RegisterNicole Fields/photo &#8211; Five contestants [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

