<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Fox&#8217;s Acceptance of Paid Product Placement Slant News Coverage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/</link>
	<description>The Good Business Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: asus</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7735</link>
		<dc:creator>asus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7735</guid>
		<description>I don’t believe your comment policy had anything to do with the comment traffic, depending upon where you put it. The addition of a here to your comments policy within the comments area has no impact. Spelling out your comments policy with a lot of confrontational language within the comment form area can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t believe your comment policy had anything to do with the comment traffic, depending upon where you put it. The addition of a here to your comments policy within the comments area has no impact. Spelling out your comments policy with a lot of confrontational language within the comment form area can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Horowitz&#8217;s Monthly Newsletters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New on the Sites, August 2008</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7728</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Horowitz&#8217;s Monthly Newsletters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New on the Sites, August 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7728</guid>
		<description>[...] Does Fox’s Acceptance of Paid Product Placement Slant News Coverage? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Fox’s Acceptance of Paid Product Placement Slant News Coverage? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Horowitz - Ethical Marketing Expert</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7718</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Horowitz - Ethical Marketing Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7718</guid>
		<description>I got a comment on the Plaxo page (this blog is syndicated to both Facebook and Plaxo) asking why this was any worse than running an ad. My reply:

Because it is *directly affecting the willingness of Fox to run negative stories on its funders*, according to the article I referenced. I'd have the same issue on the straight-ad side. And because when commercial material is presented as news, it distorts the viewers' understanding of the truth. Product placement on the entertainment side, while still an issue, is much less of an issue for me than when it shows up in newscasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a comment on the Plaxo page (this blog is syndicated to both Facebook and Plaxo) asking why this was any worse than running an ad. My reply:</p>
<p>Because it is *directly affecting the willingness of Fox to run negative stories on its funders*, according to the article I referenced. I&#8217;d have the same issue on the straight-ad side. And because when commercial material is presented as news, it distorts the viewers&#8217; understanding of the truth. Product placement on the entertainment side, while still an issue, is much less of an issue for me than when it shows up in newscasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hartford fair</title>
		<link>http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7715</link>
		<dc:creator>hartford fair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-news-coverage/2008/07/28/#comment-7715</guid>
		<description>[...] of news? Maybe it would be better if we simply banned product placement on ???objective??? newhttp://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-...Singers selected for ???Idol' contest Point Pleasant RegisterNicole Fields/photo - Five contestants [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of news? Maybe it would be better if we simply banned product placement on ???objective??? newhttp://principledprofit.com/good-business-blog/does-foxs-acceptance-of-paid-product-placement-slant-&#8230;Singers selected for ???Idol&#8217; contest Point Pleasant RegisterNicole Fields/photo - Five contestants [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
